"Clearly Totana managers should seriously consider the future of the General Plan" |
The exconcejal not attached the City of Totana and current head of communications TUP, Bethlehem Muñiz, has issued a press release to mark the last place team totanero Government "where it appears that both formations (PSOE and IU) will detract from what they wear maintained since the gestation of the General Plan in time of Juan Morales, when they became champions of Totem operation, crossing all the time that processing of political nonsense, and are committed to proceed with the processing of the PGOU such which has referred the PP to Murcia ".
Muñiz wants to remind municipal officials that "this document suffers from the same vices which have been canceled General Plans of Puerto Lumbreras and Aledo".
"A few days ago the Supreme Court confirmed the judgment annulling the General Plan of the neighboring municipality of Aledo and just look at that judgment is sufficient to apply to virtually all cases totanero document," the statement added.
There are already many rumors, qualifies the exedil, which would suggest that requested the annulment of the General Plan of Totana and, if successful, we would face a similar situation occurred in the case of Puerto Lumbreras, or more recently in Aledo Joven Futura the case of Murcia, where sentences that clearly state law, and again point to the lack of valid and binding CHS reports regarding the availability of water resources.
For Muniz, it is not questioning the need for General Plan or the possibility that in its latest wording introduced improvements, but that the document would be null and partial from the famous final approval of the document by the Ministry.
Muniz also want to remember that we in Parliament in the last reference document approved Murcia, insisted in his speech to the plenary session on the possible issue of nullity, noting the water as a priority issue in all its aspects.
Remember also that in his time as representative of the PSOE, registered and defended rejection exhaustively documents the document requesting the withdrawal.
Also, remind the PSOE that can change people sitting at a sitting but not the ideas that have been advocated and for which citizens have placed their trust, says the socialist exconcejal.
Bethlehem Muniz uses the proverb saying "who makes a basket makes a hundred" and "this is what applied from the Popular Party in the preparation of general plans, make a hundred possible irregularities and illegalities nearly applicable to documents identical in form and substance ".
In the case of the judgment of Puerto Lumbreras we read phrases like "an unfavorable report of the Hydrographic Confederation of Segura by insufficient water resources, it had refused such approval, in accordance with Article 137 of the Land Law regional ".
Or in the case of Aledo and recalling reported by Confederation of Totana respect to some unrealistic expectations that blemish, we must read the Supreme Court arguments such as "judgment of this court ... .the issue that has decided and informed the lower court is not when to certify the availability of infrastructure and water flow but to determine, considering the exorbitant growth expectations as provided by the General Plan, if the planning decision was consistent and rational, "Muniz said.
Responsible for TUP "totaneros remember that gestation of this General Plan and the tremendous conflicts arising from a totally outrageous processing in terms of economic costs and political decisions," adding that the availability of water for residential use is not the only principle but the Plan is skipped, and using the recent judgment, is extensible to Totana blatant risk on water use in agriculture and environment, real engines and values â€‹â€‹for the future of the municipality;
issues in the parallel case of Aledo, the Court ruling saying that "Together for examining the residential capacity ... large areas of growth are expected but no estimates on residential capacity of the Plan are made" and that it "would be a transformation substantially the town you hardly can support existing infrastructure and endowments ....
or whether or not effectively attend agricultural and environmental values â€‹â€‹in the disputed land. "