The last notes of the President of CEBAG show the true objective to "kill the General Plan" in any way.
To maintain the Subsidiary Regulations of 1981, as the last option to install more than one million square meters in the surroundings of Sierra Espuña, between the terms of Totana and Aledo, Municipality in which they do not want to approve the General Plan.
"It is understood clearly that heights are a smokescreen to cover the true intention. With a General Plan that protects the area of â€‹â€‹Sierra Espuña, the protection of our Natural Space would be irreversible ...", affirm from Ganar Totana IU.
It is paradoxical that since February 22 that the General Plan can be alleged, were the first 136, those presented by the President of CEBAG, related to the parceling of Sierra Espuña and that will have to study if they are unique or have some variation between they.
From Ganar Totana, they urge the President of CEBAG to appear in the elections if he wants to control the Municipal Government or the City Council and respect the current democratic representation, without interpreting documents of the Government Pact that he neither drafted nor signed, as when he signed The pact with Martinez Andreo to demobilize the demonstration convened against that General Plan.
"The President of CEBAG is not going to tell Acalde or Ganar Totana where they write or express their opinions, however much he has his lieutenants controlling to the minute what the Mayor writes or thinks.The times of the Censorship or Government Delegates, Passed by luck and you can only control who is lent to be controlled, which is not our case ... ";
Affirm since Ganar Totana IU.
The coordination between the President of CEBAG and the PSOE is more and more evident.
Very difficult to understand that a party in the Government, mount a campaign so that the neighbors go to their headquarters to be informed about the General Plan when in the Institution there are technicians for it.
Does not PSOE trust the Municipal Technicians who want to inform them?
What guarantee do citizens have to be informed by politicians and not by professional technicians?
In a recent public televised debate, it became clear the lack of alternative of the PSOE to the General Plan.
Only, in a strategy coincident with the President of CEBAG, they are against the Document approved in the Plenum and drafted by the Municipal Technicians, without offering alternatives.
Some timid points to "empty houses apples" to compensate for the deficit of 1,500,000 meters General Systems without which no Regional Government (PP, PSOE, Citizens or We can) will give approval to the General Plan of Totana.
Why not explain to the neighbors what houses would be demolished with their idea of â€‹â€‹"emptying apples"?
Would the owners be affected by the demolitions before demolishing their homes?
At what price would they be paid?
The General Plans must contemplate the zones to act and it seems that the PSOE does not want to give the alternatives because the remedy would be worse than the disease or it would be revealed that the heights alone is a "Curtain of Smoke".
In order to win Totana, there are only two clear alternatives to the General Plan: Or, the current one is approved, according to the signed Government Pact, initiating a Participatory Process afterwards, or "throwing the work and money invested into the wastebasket" A process that can take from 5 to 6 years, with no guarantee that something better will come out or from a broad agreement, like the one that exists today.
"The hundreds of building licenses that await the approval of the Plan, the licenses of livestock farms, the protection of Natural or Agricultural Spaces and Legal Security require the approval of the General Plan to which they would be" dropped "almost all Urban Conventions without Which is what Ganar Totana has defended in the Electoral Campaign of 2015, which he signed in the Government Agreement and approved by the Plenary in January 2016 with a favorable vote of the PSOE.
Source: Ganar Totana-IU