They are going to ask to hold an urgent meeting with the Mayor and with the Directorate of each of Totana's political groups, to convey his request and assessments
CEBAG is sending a letter addressed to the Mayor and representatives of Totana's political groups (PP, PSOE, IU, Ciudadanos y Podemos), to request that they extend the period of allegations to the PGMO by one more month (until April 21) Of Totana, until the Mayor, the Government Team and the political groups and the municipal technical services meet with the affected citizen groups and inform him in detail, and even individually, of the consequences that the approval of the Plan, as it is Planned, has for thousands of citizens homeowners or rural and urban properties.
According to CEBAG, before each citizen makes a claim to the Plan, he or she has the right to be informed in detail, including in writing, of the consequences that the Plan's approval may have for each of its farms or urban dwellings or Farms, in comparison with the regulations in force today and in recent years.
According to CEBAG, "citizens and owners of urban or rural properties have the right to know, because the Mayor and the political groups, when they have not yet provided us with the promised audit on the amount of debt, the destination of expenditure and responsibilities Which could be derived from having led to total bankruptcy to the City Council and to mortgage the present and the future of the current and future generations, now pretend to "stick their hands in the pocket" of thousands of citizens not only raising taxes, fees and services Up to 120% in the next 17 years, to pay around 160-180 million euros of municipal debt, but even seek to mortgage and expropriate the uses and property rights of thousands of Totana citizens, causing damages To their assets, which they estimate could reach and exceed 200 million euros.
According to CEBAG, there is no precedent, neither in the Region of Murcia nor, that they know, throughout Spain, in which it is intended to situate thousands of dwellings and rural estates out of order or rule, for a supposed "error "Of calculation or recklessness or confusion of political leaders or officials, which seriously damages the interests and the heritage of thousands of citizens, and that could lead, according to CEBAG, in the possible demand of personal and patrimonial responsibilities to the public positions or officials who Did not appreciate the aforementioned "alleged error", when they approved the Plan partially in 2011. Or those who, according to CEBAG, are now aware of it, intend to bring into the pockets and assets of thousands of citizens the economic consequences of leaving Irregularity and assume the loss of value of situating, thousands and thousands of urban or rustic houses or farms, out of order or out of standard.
From CEBAG they are not able to understand as Political Groups as Citizens or the PP, the latter with whom they agree from CEBAG that it is nonsense that Totana is the only municipality in which the IBI rises in the Region or in which taxes can rise Up to 120% in the coming years, which have been publicly or privately opposed to this nonsense, which entails expropriating and mortgaging the rights of thousands of citizens;
They have become accomplices and co-responsible for this "robbery in the pocket of thousands of totaneros", when approving a Plan quickly and running, that supported with their vote in the last Plenary, so that the Mayor can presume to have approved a Plan that, until Recently considered "corrupt" and that, as it appears in the banner placed on the facade of CEBAG, businessmen consider it may be "a robbery of thousands of totaneros."
From CEBAG they trust that the Mayor accedes to this request to extend the period of public exposure more or explain to the totaneros because he signed in June of 2015 the written commitment to make a referendum with all the citizens, and now he intends to approve the Plan without meeting Even to the Technical Working Group to report on the remedies, or to the Town Planning Council unanimously approved by the Plenary, in addition to being unable to agree on the general lines with the members of its own Government Team.