They also require you not to revoke or modify the regulations in force since 1981 (NNSS) or the Plenary agreements of 29-12-2011, which allow the construction of isolated buildings at 5,000 m
More than 130 neighbors and owners of the area of â€‹â€‹Sierra de Totana, representing about fifty housing and existing buildings and several dozen permanent residents, today presented in the Register of the City Council an individualized letter, which will also refer to the Councilor of Urbanism, in which, following an information meeting held with the City Councilor of Totana last September, they make to the Mayor several requests, among which are the following:
Not to be expropriated in fact nor modify the right of building on a farm of 5,000 meters, which the Subsidiary Rules granted to most of the area of â€‹â€‹the Sierra, exclusively to build an isolated single family dwelling.
That the unanimous agreement of Plenary of 29-12-2011, in which all the Political Groups (PP, PSOE and IU), agreed on the need to preserve the Sierra Espuña environment of tourist developments (urbanizations), But they made possible the authorization of isolated single-family dwellings, in plots of more than 5,000 mts.
In the outer perimeter of the Park.
In the allegation or written of these neighbors is not requested to build in 2,500 meters, but denounces that while rectifying and expropriating the possibility of building in 5,000 meters, as authorized in the last 35 years, now changed to Protected area (20,000 square meters in fact) in several adjacent areas of Totana and Sierra Espuña of the neighboring municipality of Aledo, in the previous Plan and in the approved text pending revision, were authorized to build houses in several hundred parcels of 2,500 Mts., Most bordering the area of â€‹â€‹the Sierra de Totana.
It is also denounced in this claim that the political representatives intend to covertly expropriate the land uses, both the numerous homes already built legally in the area of â€‹â€‹the Sierra, as in other areas of the municipality, which, like thousands Of houses located in the urban area, they are placed in the scope of the irregularity, qualifying them out of order or out of norm, with the serious damages that this classification would suppose for its owners.
In the aforementioned pleading, the more than 130 neighbors and owners of the Sierra area denounce that it seems to them an "inadmissible comparative grievance" that while one hand is intended to prohibit any building in the Sierra Espuña environment at 5,000 mts. , With the justification of the supposed urban impact that these buildings have in the Sierra Espuña Park, which, according to the owners, make them "unpaid guards" of the Park with the other hand, authorizes the construction of hundreds of housing estates, practically adjoining The Park, as you can appreciate anyone who crosses and looks to the top of the Trasvase.
All this, within the urban policy of the Mayor and UI to indirectly promote that, instead of building isolated houses in rustic plots, totaneros who are prohibited from building on their farm, buy plots of 200 or 500 m.
In the urbanizations adjacent to their estates, which now protect and in which they are prohibited from building.
The brief of the allegations ends by requiring the Director not to approve the Plan, while asking the Mayor and the Government Team to comply with the commitments signed for the municipal government program, as well as the unanimous Plenary agreements of 29- 12-2011, in which all political groups (PP, PSOE and IU) agreed that it would be possible to build isolated houses on 5,000-meter plots in most of the Sierra Espuña environment.
The claimants grant legal representation to any of the entities to which they are linked (UAG Bajo Guadalentín-COAG, Association of Sierra neighbors, APESE or CEBAG) so that, either indistinctly or jointly, "they may file remedies, carry out actions and require The responsibilities of all kinds that they consider pertinent, destined exclusively to the fulfillment of the requests and petitions previously mentioned ".
The last request made by these more than 130 claimants to the Government Team and the Mayor is that "if they do not fulfill their commitments or rectify their actions, value the possibility of explaining their radical change of position or recognize the inability to comply with Commitments made with citizens and act accordingly. "
According to reports from COAG and CEBAG and the other organizations empowered (APESE and Sierra Neighborhood Association), the allegation has been signed since last September by the complainants, but had not yet been filed, at the request of a representative of The said groups, to hold a meeting with the Mayor and personally deliver the allegations, and try to convince him to change his position.
But according to the representatives of COAG and CEBAG, not only that this meeting could not be celebrated, but the Mayor has dared to disparage and ridicule the neighbors of the Sierra, saying that only two allegations had been made and affirming that the Neighbors and owners of the Sierra want to urbanize the Sierra Espuña Park which according to them, no one, nobody, defends when the only thing they pretend is that the Mayor and political groups fulfill their commitments and can continue to make isolated houses, as the last 35, at the same time as they reproach that they lie and pretend to create the alarm of an alleged attack to the Park of Sierra Espuña, that they are the main interested in protecting.
At the same time they demand that the numerous isolated houses built legally or legalized in the last 35 years and that the Mayor explain why it is intended to prohibit building in some areas in 5,000 mts.
And the message is sent to the owner, who buys a plot of 200 or 500 mts.
In an urbanization adjoining its estate and with the Sierra Espuña Park.
The claimants and COAG and CEBAG and the Association of Sierra Neighbors and APESE, ask the Mayor that instead of failing the truth and ridicule and despise their positions, based on social networks, give them a meeting where they can To listen directly and personally, even if they do not listen or share the positions that the representatives of owners and citizens can do in a live, a meeting in which the media can witness, to which they can contrast their positions and opinions, in order to Avoid possible distorted versions of what may be the content of the meeting.
Source: CEBAG / COAG