Portal de Totana
www.portaldetotana.com
"The insistence on creating alarm with the issue of heights in the urban area by the approval of the PGOU is a real irresponsibility and shows that any type of argument is used to discredit the Plan in order not to be approved, namely by What shady interests.
Some people are using this argument to generate nervousness, to convict the environment, and to put the citizens against the general interests that will be obtained with the approval of the General Plan, and that it seems that in a particular way it harms to certain people that seem to have interests Very large in overturning the plan and do not accept a democratic outcome.
(Although in view of the follow-up they have it seems that they are not achieving their objectives).
Faced with this situation, I would like to clarify, from my limited knowledge on urban planning, (although something I have studied), the difference between out of order and out of standard.
The out-of-order regime, as set forth in the land law, and as established in the regulations set forth in the PGOU ordinances, is established for those houses and constructions that are illegally executed and have not complied with the Regulations, in this regime it is not allowed to carry out any action other than the maintenance of the minimum conditions of habitability and use, ONLY FOR CONSTRUCTIONS EXECUTED ILLEGALLY.
The out-of-rule regime, the legislation establishes it for homes that have been built within the legality with a previous legislation to the current one and that once the Plan enters into force will not comply with the current legality, it is certain that some housing will remain In this regime, (less than some say) and that from some sectors are committed to use as a throwing weapon to create alarm irresponsibly, stating that little people are going to fall to pieces their homes and not They will be able to rehabilitate them.
Nothing further from the reality, in these houses can be done all the rehabilitations that are considered appropriate, changes of use that allows planning, changes of ownership, that is, everything that could be done with a home that is not in this regime.
Moreover, if a person has a license to build a house with the heights that have been allowed up to now, taken prior to the approval of the Plan and want to execute it, you can do it without any problem.
What is not allowed in these houses is to increase its volume or voluntarily knock down the building and raise it with the same heights.
In the hypothetical case of an earthquake demolishing the structure, according to experience in Lorca, the buildings have been rebuilt with the heights and housing they previously had (REHABILITATION), even if they did not comply with the General Plan.
I hope to clarify with this publication the issue of housing that is out of standard, which have all their guarantees, are perfectly valid as an endorsement, will not be devalued and all municipalities have housing under this scheme.
So if they are going to lose value homes, and is already happening, is keeping the growth in height and further collapsing neighborhoods that are quite collapsed are already, if not, why we rent the flats and we are going to live to field?
We should think more about the general interest that in the long run is going to benefit us all and less in ours, we would go much better to all and leave a legacy in conditions to our future generations.
Antonio Murcia Martínez.
Engineer of roads, canals and ports.
Member of the Working Table of the General Plan in Representation of Ganar Totana IU
He was an active member of the Collective No to this Plan.
Source: Antonio Murcia
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies