Portal de Totana
www.portaldetotana.com
After analyzing the result of the vote on point 18 of the Agenda of the Ordinary Plenary Session of the Totana City Council, held on May 28, we carried out the following analysis.In the aforementioned point, it was a matter of submitting to the plenary a motion presented by the Now Totana Civil Platform, referring to the “Improvement of assistance and prevention of begging in the municipality of Totana”.The sole intention of the motion was to guarantee that the people who beg, and really need it, after evaluating the Municipal Social Services, were attended to in their demands in a coordinated manner, covering, within the possibilities of each case, their needs.On the other hand, the residents of Totana would have the peace of mind of knowing that both from the public administration and from the NGOs that serve these groups, help is being provided.In justifying their position against, the municipal groups GT-IU and PSOE, make a series of arguments that we can hear from the representatives of Mr.
Baños and Mr.
Megal from the time 03:22:45 onwards.
( https://www.totana.com/reportajes/2020/05/pleno-ordinario-mayo-2020/ ).Mr.
Megal begins his intervention speaking of "assumptions", and we believe that it is not necessary for the National Intelligence Center, together with the National Statistics Institute, to issue a report to know the situation that is being discussed, if he had made his work, informing themselves through the Municipal Social Services, Local Police and organizations that serve the group in question, as the speakers of the motion did, they would have communicated the real situation to him, preventing him from being unaware of it.As a Spanish teacher, who has been, you must know Mr.
Megal, the adjective pedigüeño, which according to the RAE is applied to those people who ask frequently and inopportunely, however if the problem is lexical semantics, he could have raised a modification in the terms, replacing pedigüeños that he does not like, by: “people who frequently exercise, from their individual freedom, the request for financial aid to improve their situation and livelihood”.
Perhaps the name of beggar chirps less, which is the one that is widely used in the current ordinance.He also talks about his reservations regarding the filiation, look at you, the filiation is always requested with consent, and to seek better care, which you do not want to give, because without problem.For his part, Mr.
Baños seems to have no prejudice in identifying people, acknowledges that they are identified and offered help, then he tells us how well they have done in the pandemic, the only question is that they do not people are talking about that topic, but you have to take advantage of the intervention and save minutes; It also shows that he knows how to read, and he reads the ordinance that it is precisely about improving, and that it certainly does not comply, just as it does not, that of the Ordinance Regulating Benefits to Passersby.It is clear that it is a no, because it was not their initiative, but we have no doubt that the moment they know the reality of the situation, we assume that they will inform themselves, take action on the matter, yes, as their initiative.
Source: Ahora Totana / Foto: archivo Totana.com
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies