Portal de Totana
www.portaldetotana.com
According COAG Lower Guadalentin, several recent decisions of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of Murcia guarantee that the land cadastre are rustic while not approved and initiated its development.
According to the Union of Farmers and Ranchers Lower Guadalentin (COAG), several hundred farmers and owners of agricultural land in some municipalities in its scope, as Totana and Aledo have been found in recent years were increased in an exaggerated receipts for contributions of their agricultural land and agricultural crops, by the mere fact that the soil in which it was found qualified by the PGMO (General Municipal Management Plan) as developable.
Because cadastrally their farms have been considered by the municipalities and the land as urban land, which has led to a dramatic increase and unaffordable tax bill, which is very worried and helpless to many farmers and landowners affected.
For Lower Guadalentin COAG, the above situation was more common in cases where the soil was classified as zoned developable, which coincides with the conventions because it was planned to develop housing developments that in almost all cases have not even reached or program start.
According to COAG, have also produced these increases, although it has been less frequent in rural properties crop located on undeveloped land zoned both normal or residential and especially where it is only possible to build houses or farm buildings in rural properties of at least 5000 m.
or 2500 m.
respectively.
But, reports from Farmers Union that two very recent decisions of the Supreme Court and the High Court of Justice (TSJ) of Murcia, which have been issued in the last three months, agree dictate that one can not consider cadastrally Rural and urban property, just for the fact that the rural land on which it sits is developable developable even if it is zoned (beach) - because for a rural property to be declared as urban cadastre, the instrument must be developed or plan established urban partial final determinations for their development and immediate development.
All this, according to COAG, supposed derails important revenue the Cadastre and some municipalities might be carrying irregularly and even illegally, according to these recent judgments-which could potentially have an impact of several million euros for some of the affected municipalities.
For 2014 Ibi addition, these statements open the door to those affected by this contribution allegedly collected illegally in recent years, may request a refund of the sums unduly paid.
The Farmers Union wants the Lower Guadalentin reporting this so important to the economy of hundreds of stakeholders made so that the possible affected, consult their advisors.
Because they have serious doubts that the municipalities, involved, and in particular those of Totana and Aledo, inform your neighbors involved, and even conducive to job, changing tax receipts in 2014, the negative impact of these corrections would for municipal coffers.
According to the President of the Lower Guadalentin COAG, Isidoro Cayuela, "confident that the city of Totana and Aledo-also assist in the immediate modification of those tax bills for 2014 that could be affected by these situations, and even provide information to its citizens so that they can request a refund of the sums required and paid in previous years, without filing any appeal or judicial complaint ".
Because, according to Isidore Cayuela, has doubts that the city of Totana collaborate on it because "possible illegal charges of these tax receipts are overwhelmingly located in the areas of agricultural land in the outskirts of the village, where it was expected run the 50 agreements that largely negotiated and personally approved the former mayor Juan Morales, in which it was announced in 2005 was planned to build about 40,000 homes. few conventions that the city of Totana seems to be maintained in most cases in which relief PGMO Totana and third provisional approval is said to have intended to adopt and bring to public information in the coming months. "
According Isidoro Cayuela, "now we are no longer be able to say no to farmers and landowners who had to protect the soil where crops are located and could not declare the land as building not zoned for the sole purpose of being able to build family homes and linked to holding a minimum of 5000 m farm facilities., with the excuse that this could mean that the owners of these farms are going to raise the tax. because this hypothetical risk, after these statements , no longer exists.
"What could be the danger continues to manifest Isidoro Cayuela-it is intended to correct or approve a plan which, although it has tried to make up with some changes, more symbolic than real, is based on the pillars and plan agreements and conventions 2005, which have been and continue to be, in several cases in court. And we'll be frontally against that plan because we do not think or reconvertible not remedied even without some agreements. Though it be presented as six years, thousands of claims. ago And if we have to inform public debate and with whom appropriate that so far have not followed the guidelines agreed by all political groups in the full December 2011, much less we believe the nonsense that a consensus is possible and obtain a summary or consolidated plan, including the model of the 2005 plan PP and PSOE and IU 2002, because both plans are settled in diametrically opposite pillars and strategic models. "
Source: COAG Bajo Guadalentín
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies